The Wisdom of the Seventh Day

President Trump’s recent call for American Jews to mark a special national Shabbat in honor of the 250th anniversary of American independence has thrust the Seventh Day into the center of political conversation. To understand Shabbat, however, one must first understand the people to whom it was gifted.

When I entered Beth Avraham Yoseph in Toronto last Shabbat, I had the distinct impression of stepping, not into another place, but into another order of time. Outside, the world exhibits its characteristic agitation: demonstrations, counter‑demonstrations, the almost liturgical repetition of slogans, the limitless commentary which passes for thought. Inside, in this synagogue, one encountered an order that is, in the strict sense, older than history and therefore not subject to its fluctuations.

I did not find a people improvising responses to the latest crisis, but a people engaged in practices that would have been intelligible, and perhaps familiar, to their ancestors of two millennia and more. Nothing “special” had been added to the service to meet the moment. There were no emergency resolutions, no novel prayers composed to satisfy the expectations of public opinion. The expectation that institutions must constantly adapt themselves to “relevance” was suspended. The congregation behaved as though the highest and most serious things are precisely those that do not change.

This, in our age, is the most radical of acts.

Two features of that morning impressed themselves upon me with particular force.

First, the bar mitzvah. A boy, not yet a man by our expansive contemporary criteria, stood as the latest link in a chain whose beginning began at the foot of Mount Sinai. We belong to an era that has succeeded, almost entirely, in abolishing the distinction between childhood and adulthood. The period between physical maturity and genuine responsibility has been indefinitely extended; we encounter citizens of thirty and forty who have never been compelled to assume obligations they did not first choose. The boy in the synagogue was not “choosing a path” in the modern sense. He was being initiated into a law, a teaching, which did not originate in him and which is not subject to his revision.

One could say that the ceremony marks the passage from nature to law, from mere life to commanded life. Our age has canonized the ideal of authenticity, according to which the individual must create himself ex nihilo, lest he be guilty of inauthenticity. The Jew, by contrast, learns at 13 that he is not his own creator. His identity is not a self‑legislation; it is a received task. He becomes a “son of the commandment,” obligated by a text and a covenant that precede his existence.

To us, this sounds like an offense against freedom. Yet one must ask whether the unbounded freedom of self‑construction has produced beings capable of bearing the weight of history. The Jews have survived pharaohs, emperors, inquisitors, and dictators not by self‑invention, but by fidelity: fidelity to a law given, not made. That boy’s recitation, halting yet precise, was a concrete reminder that true continuity is not the mere persistence of a biological line, but the transmission of a teaching.

The second feature was of a different but related character: the prayer for Canada.

Each Shabbat, as part of the fixed liturgy, the congregation prays for the welfare of the country in which they dwell and for its governing authorities. In a time when the Nation is treated either as an idol to be worshipped or a construct to be despised, this sober, measured petition is almost incomprehensible. The Jews at BAYT do not confuse Canada with the Kingdom of God, yet they do not withdraw into sectarian indifference. They pray that the land be blessed with peace and justice, knowing from long and bitter experience what it means when these are absent.

But their relation to the political is decisively ordered by a higher loyalty. It is captured in the verse that sounded in my ears with unusual clarity: “Put not your trust in princes, nor nobles, nor politicians, but cling to your G‑d.” Here is a principle of political sobriety and moderation that modern man, having displaced God and enthroned politics, is almost constitutionally unable to accept. We, who speak so earnestly of “faith in democracy” and “trust in institutions,” forget that faith and trust, strictly speaking, belong to the realm of the divine. Once God is removed from the horizon, the state is silently invited to occupy His vacant throne. The result is both bad theology and bad politics.

The Jews, precisely because they do not expect ultimate redemption from political arrangements, are capable of a more honest, and therefore more stable, relation to them. They can pray for the welfare of the regime without deifying it. They can obey its legitimate commands and resist its injustices without believing that its favor or disfavor determines their fate. Egypt, Persia, Rome, Christian Europe, Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia: each in its turn demanded, implicitly or explicitly, to be regarded as ultimate. Each is now a matter for historians, their once‑terrible power reduced to ruins and footnotes. The synagogue has outlived them all.

What enables this endurance? Here one must turn to the central institution of the Jewish week: Shabbat.

If one wishes to understand the distinctiveness of this people, one must begin from the seventh day. The Jew is commanded to sanctify time, not space; and among times, this day is set apart. We are told in Genesis that God completed His work on the seventh day and “rested from all His work which He had made.” A naïve reading imagines divine fatigue. A more thoughtful one recognizes that the completion of creation culminates in something other than further production. The resting is a standing‑back, a contemplation of the whole.

On Shabbat, the Jew imitates this divine act. He suspends his involvement in the business of the six days: production, acquisition, even legitimate worldly concern; in order to contemplate. This is not mere “rest” in the modern sense of recuperation for further labor. It is an ascent from the realm of necessity to that of meaning. It is the weekly reminder that the question “what is this for?” cannot ultimately be answered within the horizon of work, power, or pleasure.

We live in a time that has immortalized the six days and forgotten the seventh. Our civilization glories in its capacity to transform nature, to extend human power, to accelerate everything. But it has little patience for the activity of standing back, of looking at the whole. We possess an unprecedented command over means and an equally unprecedented confusion about ends. Perpetual motion anesthetizes the awareness of our ignorance. The Jew, by command, interrupts this motion. He is not permitted to forget that there is an eternal order in light of which all human projects must be judged.

Thus the people of the seventh are, in a sense, a people permanently out of step with the ages. They preserve, in ritual form, the memory that the world is creation and not mere fact, that human life is accountable to something beyond history. In moments of crisis, when others discover with horror that politics cannot bear the weight they have placed upon it, the Jew returns, as he has always returned, to Shabbat. This return is not an escape from suffering but a reorientation within it.

During the service at BAYT, prayers were said for the people of Israel, as they have been said through worse dangers. The God who did not forsake them in Egypt, who did not abandon them under Persian decrees, Roman legions, medieval expulsions, or Nazi gas chambers: this same God is invoked in Toronto. One notes, if one is not blinded by prejudice, a certain pattern. If He did not forsake them then, on what reasonable ground can one assert that He will forsake them now in Toronto, London, or New York? The continuity of Jewish existence under conditions that should have ensured its extinction is not a matter that can be adequately explained by sociological vocabulary alone.

The Jew is eternal because his God is eternal. This is not a claim of biological immortality or political invincibility, but a statement about the ground of identity. The people persists because it understands itself, at its core, as called by One who is beyond the vicissitudes of time. That boy, becoming bar mitzvah, is inscribed into this calling; he does not create it.

We, children of a secular age, are tempted to regard such assertions as at best edifying myths, at worst dangerous illusions. Yet it is our own myths that are beginning to show their fragility. We placed our trust in progress, in history, in reason; as if these could function as substitutes for the divine. Progress has brought us great power and little wisdom. History, personified, has proven an indifferent god; it judges no one. Reason, deprived of any knowledge of the good, has become the servant of whatever passions happen to predominate.

From the vantage point of the synagogue, these failures are less surprising. A people that has recited for millennia, “Put not your trust in princes, nor nobles, nor politicians, but cling to your G‑d,” is not easily seduced by new absolutes masquerading under secular names. It knows, in its bones, that all princes pass away, all regimes transform or fall, while the command to remember, to keep, to sanctify, remains.

Leaving BAYT after that Shabbat, one did not feel the cheap consolation offered by rhetoric. One felt instead the sobering, and in a sense comforting, realization that the present crisis is not unique in the decisive respect. The tempest may be new in its instruments, not in its essence. Against it stand a people whose existence is ordered, not to the latest emergency, but to the eternal. They have claimed for themselves, and for the world, the seventh day as a time to step back, to contemplate the whole, to recall the unchanging.

We, who have almost entirely forgotten how to do this, might yet learn from them: if we can still recognize our teachers. The eternal people serves, perhaps above all, to remind the rest of us that human nobility depends on a relation to what does not pass away. When that relation is severed, princes and politicians rush in to fill the void, and we gladly entrust to them what no mortal can bear.

To remember that one must not depend on mere mortals for one’s redemption is, today, already a great act of wisdom. The Jews have been repeating this remembrance, weekly, for a very long time.

READ MORE from Dimpee Brar:

The Erasure of the Mother

READ MORE:

The World’s Most Controversial Scrap of Skin

Faith Among Young People Surges, Providing a Missing Anchor

By kevin